Gildred v Foster 153554/2017 Home . Carolina Gildred Joan Snitzer Paul Pellicoro Seth Alan Rafkin Michael Foster creeates humor to fend of Gildred ego and waste of money to undo the inevitable of an infidelity It is time for Mr. Philip to get real about what his method for character is doing to iself Gildred is ok with redoing the trauma he wants the world to believe while he is certain too many are laughing at him except for dark money he is blinded to understand what everyone is certain of Jennifer M Bogue


Carolina Gildred FMT-Consultants-Rancho-Santa-Fe-Philip-Tom-Gildred.png In May, 2016 Mrs. Gildred Carolina approached Mr. Michael Foster owner of Foster's Economical Services Co.Here Pro Se Mr. Michael Foster complaint seeks damages on the offset of two hundred million dollars... Let's break NTRODUCTION - SUBJECTIVE

To assume is not the same as euphemisms "Big," "Black," or "Dick," Words of Defendant Tom Gildred misrepresentation by impersonation as a "Mrs. Gildred" Specific Fact as in fraud counts. Here to "Assume" is simply to equate oneself as a fool before the Court. It also elevates plaintiffs Pro Se Status above "Homelessness or Displace" as This Court appears to
reference in filings by the Clerk. Counsel's in Defendant Tom Gildred answers to the Amended Complaint [FIRST] asserts in the body of its Demurrer "Unintelligible," "Incoherent" to invite the Courts assumption or to rule or to sustain the Demurrer on its face filings used to delay and dissuade Unethical Conduct is rampant NOW in the face of Judge Blaine K. Bowman who's Forty-year judicial experience invites a coherent admissions: Michael Foster a ProSe Plaintiff in oral arguments 16 06/07/24. [By my own experience in person with (Res.Public place SD) Tom who's asceticisms concurred "That . . Couple" is the only political couple in San Diego who pretends "he" cannot be bought" on quote.
Even upon plaintiffs conclusory understandings, Defendants Here invites Plaintiff that Privileged to assert reasonings before The Honorable Blaine K. Bowman, [Fear] and to compel an argument with Counsels Delmore Greene, but most of all Plaintiff is advocating for ethical conduct in the Complaint Amended against Defendants immoral unethical conduct. An Establish San Diego Business Man. Counsel admits, "I ASSUME" a document is NOT (A document not even close to Response herein). Counsel same breath continues before Hon. Judicial Officer Bowman to further suggest it was ethical by fact and Law (Live Court) That the Court Order Plaintiff to upload Counsel's version of The Amended Complaint.
The fact here is simple: Plaintiff Pro Se survive Defendants two false Criminal Police Reports, the product of a fatal mental disease erotamania, degradations by euphemisms even falsities to plaintiffs age and publications of an aged-older draft subscription of plaintiff to earn an unexpected "Non-Criminal Status" in Pro Se non-defendant minority status before especially Judicial Officer Blaine. This fact is enough to accept the Courts Conclusion "By Defendants answer to its own #2 demurrer prematurely. It is Proper the Court tentative order line5 " Plaintiff filed a substantive opposition to both Gildred's demurrer and motion to strike," "SUBSTANTIVE". The Defendants Demurrer is denied consistent wilt fact, the Law and Unethical Conduct.

As for defendant's answer to Plaintiffs rebuttal to its dissuasive deplorable demurrer the Court's tentative rule already finds Plaintiffs Response by all appearance to be legally SUBSTANTIVE.
The Demurrer's instead uselessly "assumes" facts and law as to its own versions or titles. Similar to Defendants filings it is clear defendant is not even reading plaintiffs responses or responses yet to be filed. Rather defendants is focused on words by error as for "(1 lvs(2)" Moreover Defendant's demurrer assumes a defendant "Cohen" with Gildred of which defendants is the #2 demurrer relative too. (see Page 19 First paragraph.).
The amended complaint [FIRST] outlines the law and facts consistent with defendants past, current and ongoing unethical harmful conduct sufficiently Count by Count and legal and factual specific throughout the body of the the entire complaint. The Courts apparent sighting in tentative rule is also a fact.
The Amended complaint count 1 to 8 does not assume titles of facts legally actionable, trial-able as it established, event by event spot-on even to place defendant Gildred physically and virtually culpable under each Count. It is understandable Defendants admitted "assumption" being that Plaintiff is the legal neophyte to Legal representation not nearly as experience as the Defendant Gildred or his selective Counsels.
The facts, by law and overwhelming preponderances defeats any cause defendants demurrer assumes uncertain. therefore demurrers to the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint as uncertain is for dissuasive reasons only.
Amended Complaint spot-on places the defendant by sworn affirmation by written fact and other facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivisions (e) and (f). Plaintiffs amended complain [FIRST] is not consistent (admitted) with high profile legal quantifications, largely though the facts and preponderance only gravitate each current and ongoing act of unethical
conduct by Defendant Mr. Tom Gildred for misrepresentations The defendant even impersonated himself as a "Mrs. Gildred as properly outlined in each associated actionable counts and throughout the complaint.
It is clear Defendants cannot respectfully submit to the Court that the Court should sustain the Demurrer to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint [FIRST] base on assumption. Included Here: the Court would find that it is "Apparent" the Amended Complaint submitted by Plaintiff is SUBSTANTIVE enough to deny defendants demurrer/MTS in its entirety.

for an infomercial
FASTWORD - 2024/ Justice Keri Katz San Diego Superior Court: Gildred is a Defendant - and a Cross-Complaint Plaintiff. The Gildred group often informs itself best if they are Complaining about something. Anything - even against its own confufled fictitious cross-Defendants. It seams as "A feel good moment". But Gildred already drawn the full deposit on their side of the Breach of Contract that is really not a breach - it just can't be done -Michael Foster is an innovator of wonderful life expressions individuals and even groups of professionals could reach out sense feel and touch Which The Gildred Group is aware of. The Group wants to Draw in the same draft in their Cross-Complaint. Most law geniuses refer to themselves as LLCs' Gildred Law Group - is first a Threat (Group). By and large no one wants to defend themselves against a GROUP. Long and Short - electing to gather individuals with the background of a poor, uneducated in some instances unethical upbringing allows the leader of the Gildred Group to sustain regardless. The leader doesn't need to name himself - if there's enough proxies willing to volunteer themselves, their names, their businesses, the professional titles. The Gildred Group Leader is: A Lawyer, Doctor of Psychiatry, an Art Collector, an individual with many other certified (equivalent to) Professional Titles. On the other hand. Michael Foster is no Sam Backman-Fried - Michael's history is written dot-by-dot slowly and meticulously. When that happens, anticipation of the future by connecting the dots becomes less stressfull. Which is to say - Michael is aware of who is the leader of this GROUP. This threat.

That was the informercial: now back to the news: ...
and believes because of witnesses, itself, it's businesses, it's actual losses and impending losses, the complaint, each cause and the facts to be unwrap over discoveries, including appropriate bills of costs and or to be tried by a jury to be well within reasonable calculating. However the application for relief is submitted with the complaint also at the courts discretion.
he-Complaint-for-Damages Foster v Gildred Hon. Justice Kari Katz This is another sad case of what has become an epidemic of abuse. Here, at the hands of 3 affluent purported business professional entities in Philip T. Gildred, Gildred Professional Businesses and The Gildred Family of San Diego. As such they use their positions and power to influence devastating circumstances upon others who are poor, intellectually a threat and without adequate legal help. This is another sad case of Judicial Intervention where the only medium where reasonable dialogue can be directed to affluent purported business professionals who are flawed. The Civil Judicial System by its rules, laws and codes allows permissions to filed by a poor person to which it demands to each filings of an honest answer or no answers and may result in justice against those who use their position and power to influence devastating circumstances upon others who are poor, intellectually a threat and without adequate legal help
THE FACTS: The Initial Conflict: a). The Public interest of Defendant’s Character was assumed flawed. b). The Defendant demanded that the romantic relationship with plaintiff must be Undone. And,. c). The verbal contract with plaintiff to use Plaintiff’s Business Content (iDears) to enhance Defendant’s footprints in current and emerging technology markets was canceled, quote: to a “Distant 2nd interest”. Unquote. So we Foster files restraining order pending certification for Tom Gildred many forms of harassment.

"Defendant usurped unauthorized authority over Plaintiff by accessing secret passwords to gain full access to Plaintiff’s Credit Bureau Accounts, Better Business Bureau Account, Paypal Business Accounts, and other personal, social, private residential, and business accounts, Filed False Criminal Police Reports and Published Publicly Maleficent Professional Mental Opinions falsely describing plaintiff. Then: Defendant Philip T Gildred, actions as an individual and Principal to Defendant's Businesses & The Gildred Family of San Diego, preempted and commenced a lawsuit against Plaintiff for punishment purposes, falsely accusing plaintiff of criminal conduct in defendant's police reports. "

Defendant Gildred Drafted & file false criminal conduct reports SDPD/NYPD, use proxies to generate impulses from plaintiff to support crime reports, use A Civil litigation for advertisements free publicity also to influence impulsive reactions consistent with crime reports, use business influence to forcefully implement and enforce a Stipulation Agreement without payments promised to be attach to the addendum at signing also to generate reactions from plaintiff consistent with Defendant Gildred Criminal Reports.

Defendant Gildred Philip T Defense attorney is San Diego Leading Pest control bisiness legal defense expert but Michael Foster Claims Fraud, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Equitable Title, Unjust Enrichment, Libel, Bad Faith is met by Mr. Terrense demurrer. Some say Terrence enters the litigation with giant roars but apparently left his legal dentures perhaps at his office.

#1. IN SIMPLE THE LEGAL PRINCIPLE: A settlement agreement is a contract, and the legal principles which apply to contracts generally apply to settlement contracts. The consensus leading up, at and post a settlement agreement notwithstanding the articles listed in the addendum.
#2. BACKGROUND: Plaintiff, as a poor person, is also an avid dancer who performs, choreographs, and instructs as time and finances permit. Plaintiff, as a poor individual, splits his time with the purpose of nuisance. Plaintiff, as a poor person, is an individual at all times unrepresented by legal counsel, a product of the defendant's admissions to usurp control over individuals or persons who are without counsel, with access to business trade secrets and people who are poor. Defendant is the owner of various technology-driven sales and services firms "Professional Businesses".
#3. laintiff brings claims for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty against Defendant Philip T. Gildred based on false representations made in an "Addendum/Exhibit" to "The Agreement" which resulted in misappropriations, fraud, and theft of Plaintiff's trade secrets. Additionally, Plaintiff asserts a claim for statutory and common law unfair competition and interference with Plaintiff's business relations and sources of livelihood. Plaintiff, as a poor person, seeks permission to proceed with each hearing telephonically or via video conference.
#4. DAMAGES: As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Philip T Gildred's actions, Plaintiff has suffered financial and punitive* damages. Plaintiff is entitled to recover the full amount of actual, consequential, and incidental damages it suffered and continues to suffer as a result of Defendant Philip T Gildred's breaches. Plaintiff has also suffered economic losses and loss of goodwill due to Defendant's fraud and is entitled to judgment against Defendant Philip T Gildred and Defendant's Professional Businesses & The Gildred Family of San Diego to recover these damages. (Punitive: here means *Punishment to Defendant for malicious and/or incredibly reckless behavior.) .
conclusion Plaintiff seeks various forms of relief, including actual damages, damages for harm to reputation and loss of goodwill, punitive* damages, attorney's fees and expenses, costs, and any other relief deemed just and proper by the court. (Punitive: here means *Punishment to Defendant for malicious and/or incredibly reckless behavior.)
Certainly! Let’s delve into the Foster vs Gildred case.

In this legal battle, we have Michael Foster as the plaintiff and Philip T. Gildred, along with various entities associated with him, as the defendant. Here are some key details:

  1. Case Overview:

  2. Background:

    • Michael Foster, the plaintiff, alleges fraudulent conduct by Philip T. Gildred.

    • The Gildred group consists of various entities, including Gildred Professional Businesses and The Gildred Family of San Diego.

    • The case involves claims related to breach of contract and damages.

    • Foster seeks relief for the harm caused by the defendants’ actions1.

    • "The Contract" not only perpetually survives the delineation of Plaintiff's Business URLS fraudulently., it OPENLY threatens URLS current, intermittent or future which are unrelated to Defendants Gildred et al Claims in Gildred vs Foster. Even if Gildred vs Foster were to be adjudicated and found to have be truthful by verdict of a jury the negligence by Gildred to include Base URLS, and is clear Fraud and Intentional Misrepresentation. Defendant Gildred's actions by all accountability have more to do with the survival of Defendant's USPTO TEAS Trademark "Tom Gildred" rather to sustain frivolousness in filings Gildred v Foster or defendant's filings in "Foster vs Gildred". Herein: Plaintiff Request the Court to reverse geoparticulars adduce by Gildred's abusive use of a TEAS Trademark to harm plaintiff's current, intermittent and future business URLS and in General to reverse Gildred's authored fraud by "The Contract" in which Gildred intentional misrepresentation holds public URLS such as, and at hostage to extensions particularly to title or handles belonging to Plaintiff or handles Gildred deems to be negative to himself or himself as "A Service" as defined by TEAS USPTO Trademark "Tom Gildred" by the instrument Order and Judicial Seal of a duly appointed Supreme Court Judge.

    • Gildred Defense filings and open conduct, Gildred et al in general implodes grief, empathy, pity and sympathy both from the Court and the public. The question begs if grieved why haven't Gildred et al to this point does not actualize any concern for his mistakes. If deserving of empathy why enunciate the ridicules assuage to have offended Gildred et al by public media in twin states and online promotions. If provisioning pity, why attempt to enforce non-civil crimes defendant gildred assert to have been the conduct of Plaintiff in naming itself a Victim assuage to have suffered as a result of Plaintiff's criminal actions and for sake of Sympathy - How does defendant Gildred ascertain this benefit in clear retaliatory filings in "Cross-Complaints" naming among others of 1 to 10 fictitiously assigned cross-defendants. The measure of the Law as for "The Contract" by virtue of its execution in Gildred vs Foster by perpetual judicial Seal of the New York Supreme Court of Quantum Merut in ultimate reversal by the Superior Court and by Defendant's actions to defraud the USPTO TEAS registration of a Trademark for abusive purposes also be reverse to the extent of the Courts Jurisdiction so as to delineate all forms or action in Defendant's use to frame actions, complaints or causes sighting negative impact to trademark "Tom Gildred" effectively to the within Content related to the "Instrument" in "Foster vs Gildred" and "The Contract" in "Gildred v Foster".

  1. Context:

    • This case highlights an unfortunate trend of abuse, where affluent business professionals misuse their power to harm others who lack adequate legal resources. TRIAL-BRIEF-FOSTER-vs-Delmore-Greene-LLP Foster is interpreted as the Courageous Whistleblower of Unethical Practices from the Ground up in reasons for Delmore Greene LLP Terence Leo Greene synonymous to Attorneys loudly in Foster vs Gildred intervention in the reversal of Tom Gildred Fraudulent Misrepresentations. Foster vs Gildred includes Sanctions for inappropriate conduct from The defense attorney Delmore Greene LLP. Delmore Greene in San Diego Superior Court. The Court began Heating up with Her Honorable Judicial Officer Keri Katz - the next date is schedule for possible evidence hearing on June 6th 2024 Foster vs Gildred Pre Trial Brief Hon. Blaine K. Bowman. This type of Bloc-HD lawyering is summing up to ONE conclusion: SANCTIONS post TRIAL. FOSTER REQUEST WAIVER OF discovery process or in the alternate Discovery mediation from the Court by Order. Delmore Greene LLP calls it's Counter parts Attorneys and legal firms "Small & Nimble" according to information on Delmore Greene San Diego attorney website. The firm recently settle for the Rancho sante fe A Golf club defense

    • .I have a lease that is current and sporadic bills from Verizon etc., gets in.

      My mailbox shows signs of tampering constantly. I called the police, they only provided me with a harassment report consistent with the person and floor assumed to be responsible for tampering, destroying and or returning my mails to the post office for mails delivered in the building to my mailbox #C2.
      (I have a mailbox - there are mails addressed to people and companies without a suit or mailbox - just tossed on the floor in the lobby - but these are left untampered with).
      I repeat this is the current proper address.

      I don't know of a way to know WHO properly is taking mails address to "Michael Foster", destroying them or returning to the post office but it's NOT a postal worker responsible for delivering the mail.

      The postal office Supervisor cautioned: There are times the mail-to addressee in question have been kept for over a month then returned to the post office. If I am not contacted by a person who of certain sent me a mail? Then I could never know for sure if a mail was returned or destroyed.

      The only recourse I have is to file a civil lawsuit which I will. At this time, I am prepared to file a lawsuit to include "Fictitiously Named" individuals as I think at minimal, I know which floor-owner or its tenant is tampering, with my mails.
      As you can observe it is very upsetting these concerns and I am determined to get to the bottom of it.

      A new landlord (or proxy) in this Corp building snatches my mail then drops it at the post office under the pretense he does not know who I AM.

      The Preponderance is circumstantially Factual at this time: As for my current lawsuit "Foster v Gildred" in 2019 an anonymous developer purchased "428-432 West 19th street". The building hosts my office from 2016 -
      As you know under very extreme and unfortunate circumstances, I literally Lost EVERYTHING including my $0.99 socks and household stocks including a collection of paintings - in 2017-2018 of address "38 West 31st Street Unit 108A". Then, I had 1 month to vacate my office as the building was assumed to have suddenly SOLD. It was sold. I provided video surveillance cameras throughout the entire building. From my analysis after viewing video footage _The Mr. Gildred guy_ was Physically in the building and profoundly, in my office. The building was negotiated for 40 which I was partly involved, then poof another (anonymous) buyer took it for 15 million less CASH. I assume the only reason why the new owners treated me harshly under full anonymity was because the purchase was done by; "Gildred Building Development Company".
      I have tools to investigate this, but life demands for me personally have been near life threatening - say the least.

      I will not be surprised if a recent buyer closed on "1-3 Eldridge Street Corp" (or parts thereof) as it was rumored a sellout was in the making from couple of owners. The new owner may have purchased (buyout) a floor or floors in this building.
      I am use to racial discrimination in Chinatown as from some Chinese people to me as a "Hagquay" (black guy).
      This method of consequential harassment aligns with the shameless character of my nemesis Mr. Tom Gildred, (Who is Patient and Meticulous, a CPA, a sorry soul with ambitions too personal especially towards Michael Foster Sadly - for that I hope I am wrong). Nonetheless, it is ridiculously to destroy or return my mails, but even as my records of tenancy is consistent with this address and I LIVE HERE.
      The post office cannot intervene.
      One thing is for sure - I receive mails here. THE THING is also; I CAN'T get a name of this new LANDLORD - The Corp has 3 to 4 owners. Tenants mainly communicate to their landlords through the building management company (EVERYONE IS CHINESE SPEAKING).
      Here is a dark side to all of this "I EXISTS".
      My landlord owns 2 floors, another landlord I know herself and her family owners 2 floors - other landlords own several other floors. I try to draw reference from certain tenants who have harassed me by accusative aspersive remarks. Specific people I've seen coming in or going out overtime joking at me or calling me the termite guy. (I'm not thinned-skinned - I understand & I disarm provocations). But as I said I cannot get a name and this owner's actions is not public. The Post office only says it's an issue between me and the landlord. They cannot verify which landlord or a person by name. They cannot help me with these inquiries. So, I get mails whenever I get mails.

      This is great to have your communications on the record. I have this data from you-now. I can prove this postal mail issue of a bias landlord is still going on. Where I take it from here is something I must discuss with the authorities.
      Attach: New York Resident ID, Accusative Tenant, July 2023 updated lease, and recent harassment police report.

      With Thanks


    • Judicial intervention becomes necessary when reasonable dialogue fails, especially when dealing with flawed professionals who wield their influence disproportionately1.

Remember, legal cases can be complex, and the court system aims to provide justice.

The facts are CLEAR IN THIS CIVIL LAWSUIT California San Diego Superior Court Civil Unlimited Michael Foster the Tango Instructor from New York against Defendant Philip T Gildred, for his actions as an individual and Principal to Defendant's Businesses & The Gildred Family of San Diego, engaged in fraudulent and abusive behavior towards Plaintiff, resulting in damages. The Law Misguided Gildred into assumptions He'd gotten away with the equivalent of a major violent crime similar to that as tacit as homicide: Legal MISTAKE: A settlement agreement is a contract, and the legal principles which apply to contracts generally apply to settlement contracts. Foster v Gildred 37-2023-00038663-CU-CO-CTL: This case involves facts alleging fraudulent conduct by Defendant Philip T Gildred, defendant gildred actions as an individual and Principal to Defendant's Businesses & The Gildred Family of San Diego. Plaintiff, an individual without legal representation, claims that Defendant misused their position and power to influence and harm Plaintiff. Defendant falsely accused Michael Foster of criminal conduct, gained unauthorized access to Foster's personal and business accounts, and breached the settlement agreement. Plaintiff further asserts claims of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, and interference with business relations. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for economic losses, loss of goodwill, and other related harm caused by Defendant's actions. Conclusion: Plaintiff, as a poor person without legal counsel, has brought forth a case against Defendant Philip T Gildred, actions as an individual and Principal to Defendant's Businesses & The Gildred Family of San Diego. The allegations include fraudulent conduct, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, and interference with business relations. Plaintiff seeks damages for the harm suffered as a result of Defendant's actions. The court will determine whether Defendant is liable and the amount of damages to be awarded to Plaintiff. Therefore the defendant must answer to the facts proving neither exist fraud, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, interference with business relations, damages as with the Media specific to stories reported by Julia K Marsh The New York Post, Stephen Rex Brown The New York Daily News and it's Online Press Reader and Donald Bourder of The San Diego Reader to update, make corrections to the stories Gildred admits to have functionally Defame Michael Foster and (3) To vacate each Claim against Foster in its initial Complaint before the court and (4) To compensate Foster for da mages to Foster (Punitive) stemming from 1, 2 & 3 above. The witness in private session with Foster Ordered Foster to Sign the current Agreement and to be assured the addendum to the agreement will be updated that same day before close of business. Foster followed suit and uploaded a Rescission Letter, Attention: Witnesses and Gildred after business hours that same day. Days followed and there was No response from the witnesses, Gildred or from Gildred's Lawyers summoning an all out legal back and forth to which is the result of This Lawsuit Foster vs Gildred sighting among other stuff "Breach of Contract" and "Trademark Infringements" to Foster and Foster's Professional Business URLs. Though many efforts to discourage Gildred even from the witnesses in "Off the record" video conferences? Gildred continued neverminded the breaches aforesaid. According to the applicable laws consistent with the certification of the complaint attach and filed in the Superior Court of California the Honorable Judge Kari Katz. Foster vs Gildred in an order described the use of indexing algorithms to falsely update, enlist or make available incorrectly statements falsely reporting in an article describing Michael Foster and for the Purpose of long-term Defamation to the Character of Michael Foster and for the purpose of trademark infringement on trademarks own by Michael Foster and for the purpose demarcation to business common to that of Michael Foster the attach search results are Non-factual in content, irrelevant and inconsistent with the current Facts. As such the content also enlist false statements of Defamations: 1. Dancing Devil, 2. Foster became Unhinged, 3. Adding age to Michael Foster or incorrectly listed Michael Foster 10 years older, 4. Photo false detailed image of Michael Foster, 5. Highlights of statements define in multiple certificates of filings and court documents to be false and content descriptions with intent to defame the Character of Michael Foster

By conclusion to this Press Release Report: was also Michael & Mrs. Carolina Gildred creation as reflective of Mrs. Gildred son Bryant Castillo who lives' with an assertive medical disability. Mr. Foster is not irresponsible. The facts in alignment with Tom & Carolina Gildred of Rancho Santa Fe and the couple's ability to pay for a story to be written their ways are inherently ascribed indefinitely as insidious because they are FACTS and the facts are the Facts.

Finally: Your help by transcribing to the press release will help Michael to live his life, love for family and dance, out side of the ignorance of Tom & Carolina Gildred in their public matrimonial debacle. Please give Michael a fighting chance and an opportunity to confront the couples ongoing irresponsible manifestations.
EDITOR IN CHIEF NewsNetNowWire*: Seth Alan Rafkin, Jennifer Bogue
(*): Along with websites, & a hosts of
other urls was also registered during the same period. Mr. Rafkin's Quote "

Toggle navigation

Quote- Lyn & Phil Gildred
"I would not have this family name caught up in public ridicule"
 "It better be him (The Lover) or her (Tom Gildred's wife Carolina in Tango Video below).
But the Rancho Santa Fe Gildred family of San Diego have taken the high road of destruction. Tom Gildred & Wife Carolina Gildred leads off an Infidelity "Catch & Kill" Matrimonial Corruption debacle gone bad in Gildred V Foster 153554/2017

Face to Face with FACTS. Hi there, please pitch in with your donate of $10.00 or more to Artists Michael Foster an Artist in defense against obtuse abuse of power and constructive harassment. A retribution Fund Raiser towards A Lawsuit against Mr. & Mrs. Gildred et al.
A North San Diego CA., Catch & Kill Matrimonial Infidelity. Which was a private family issue, publicized by Mr. & Mrs. Carolina Gildred too forward a thinking. Your support helps to confront an Overly Ambitious Gildred IIED & Defamation Reverse Indignation. Your DONATION will provide Mic with a fighting chance e to confront Gildred's ongoing irresponsible onslaught of constructive harassment manifestations and to thwart any further evil money y input used by Tom Gildred, FMT Consultants, The Gildred Development Companies independent for hire fake contractors and thousands of spam callers to Mic's business and persona phone contacts and emails and to Catch & Kill Mic Fos Intellectual Properties unrelated to the Gildred's Defamation Lawsuits. Links of support Gildred Mrs. & Mic's video Joan Snitzer Barnard .edu Motive as professional witness
Who's Mic (Dance) (Business). NewsNewNowWire: Artists against obtuse abuses and constructive

Tom Gildred harassment campaign againts Wife's lover Michael Foster
Above: Albeit Tom Gildred Practicing his Golden Swing at Michael Foster's NYC Office.
(Less than Weeks after Cease & Desist Order Stipulation to stay away from the Defendant).

Michael Foster in office found to video tape Tom Gildred secretly persuading Landlord

In the stark probable end to Tom Gildred and Carolina Gildred's relentless malicious vindictive harassment and reverse IIED-Defamation campaign, FMT Consultants Chairman Philip Gildred attempts to use frivolous Supreme Court filings to order illegal "Take Downs of 25+ domains. One of these domain is owned by Mic Fos "M.C.S.I. Security". Metro Commute Security International is A United States Trademark & Patent Pending Information technology Software APP. helps encrypt Video & Voice communications to avoid truncation, sinkholes, SMS sandboxes, scans, honeypots of ISPs & VoiP.
The Gildred v Foster charismatic frivolous filings almost made it off at long distance from Del Mar San Diego to New York Supreme Court under the guise of a matrimonial Catch & Kill infidelity reversed IIED/Defamation indignation in New York State Supreme Court. But Judge Louis L. Nock on ruling it out as a FOWL play.
Mr. Philip Gildred summed up an ultimate satisfaction in Gildred v Foster 153554/2017 by applying signatures to court docs with clear knowledge it will be used fraudulently.
The Fraud Doc was COINED with over accelerated speed. Gildred attorneys Seth Rafkin, Jennifer Mcguire Bogue did not request deletion or revision in hopes details of the Fraud Doc may slip by without Supreme Court Judge Louis Nock's notice.

But The Gildred Harassment continued. It is not over: In the Gildred world: ""Money is power-supreme over anything or anyone that is a remote minority - in the Dollar or in personality". The Group Family Name GILDRED and its Evil Money According to an x-brother in-law to Tom Gildred, The Family is known to finance some of San Diego's most corrupt lobbyist and politicians. Over decades old history of San Diego their Evil Money have weaved its way into some of San Diego's most prominent public societies including Balboa Park, SDMA, San Diego Zoo, where past and present board members (were) inclusive of George Gildred, Lyn & Phil Gildred, Julie Gildred, Tory Gildred. But Tom Gildred in chief associate himself as the trade name under titles such as Philanthropists, Art Collector, Wine Collector, CEO & Board Member to some of San Diego's larges non for profit organization.". The Group Family Name GILDRED and its Evil Money According to an x-brother in-law to Tom Gildred, The Family is known to finance some of San Diego's most corrupt lobbyist and politicians. Over decades old history of San Diego their Evil Money have weaved its way into some of San Diego's most prominent public societies including Balboa Park, SDMA, San Diego Zoo, where past and present board members (were) inclusive of George Gildred, Lyn & Phil Gildred, Julie Gildred, Tory Gildred. But Tom Gildred in chief associate himself as the trade name under titles such as Philanthropists, Art Collector, Wine Collector, CEO & Board Member to some of San Diego's larges non for profit organization.

Tom Gildred however is quite thin-skinned when it comes to facing the truth about what happened during the early months of his marriage to Carolina Gildred. Carolina Gildred and Lover Michael Foster
Here: This website tells of wonders why the Gildred Family of San Diego pays to keep clear of public ridicule by maintaining an arsenal of Pay-Per-Reporters and Scam Popcorn Attorneys (Seth Rafkin, Jennifer Bogue Rafkin ESQ) ready to bid the family's dirty works. Money and the Law is KING in San Diego - Frivolous Lawsuits do not warrant sanctions against attorneys or their clients. Indeed one cannot properly exact true honest harm to its competition domestic or business unless it can fund a Dragonetti legal filing combined with castigations paid through Public Ridicule. The Gildred Family of Rancho Santa Fe knows this best.
One wonders why certain blasphemous stories designed by pay per reporters who sometimes call themselves journalists doesn't get edited, update or completely removed when its found to be outright false.

Tom and Carolina Gildred at Las Ventanas circle Del Mar Rancho Santa Fe San Diego California Here's (pic.above) an example of The Reader's article

A veteran Pay Per writers who's now retired after a life of shame and plagiarism throughout his career at The Reader. The Reader though, doesn’t seam to be having the slightest concerns. It's writers honest or Pay Per journalists reads over 99 active writers.

One wonders what's a news story lately if it's not paid forward with mix of truths and an abundance of falsity. But that's The Reader. Here's this story: (A pay per writer writes up a lengthy column on a person with no defense in fact the writer picks on a man who lives in New York City.

A man who isn't even a neighborhood resident to ascribe relevance to a local San Diegan with a bruised ego. In the meat of his article he interviews with The Gildred's attorneys but states clearly at the end of the pay per bully rant of writers that he could not contact Michael Foster from New York or The Gildred from San Diego.

A veteran indeed: His story...: Tom Gildred’s wife, Carolina, goes to NY courts! Since 1929, the Gildred family has been prominent in San Diego. Its first project was construction and operation of the Fox Theater, now known as Symphony Hall. Through the years, Gildred Companies has developed properties ... City Lights July 26, 2017, But what ever happens to the true story? Perhaps if half of his falsity writ up turned out to be remotely true then, maybe The Reader might have done a follow-up. At least to clear his falsity. But when The Reader name, names it must be very careful to withdraw from Cuckservative titles such as Tom and Carolina Gildred. This couples tantrum is indicative of a feverish penchant for impetuous attention. They're Northern San Diego's snapshot for the Quick-A-Go couple. Tom: from investigative interviews what we know of him...”

A fundamental simple (a man who does not know how to have a conversation with anyone).
He will never approach a public figure or personality with even the slightest bit of notoriety without first placing that person under the radar of intense scrutiny. Used to think he's genuinely recluse but found that he's a loner with the spite of a mad-woman with cash at her disposal. The darkness of such an individual who without earnest digress seams to have a penchant for anonymously activating benign tentacles of brash manipulative notions about anyone he hopes to [even] remotely sidelined for friendship or [worst] for foe.

This is the one Guy in North San Diego who is convinced that there isn't a lobbyists or uprising politician he won't be able to sideline. [...and that without personal confrontation]. His Gildred Development Companies, Emerald SD [health and linen] holds a chair at SDMA, praise himself as a Philanthropist, Constructively Earned himself The San Diego Ernst and Young entrepreneur of the year award but could not confront face to face a man invited by his young wife in his own Las Ventanas Circle Rancho Santa Fe's 5-bed 3baths home. So much that when found his wife fixing the strangers rumpled hair, instead he only Scudded and sat with a glass of wine looking at rewinds of Armstrong's classic win of “Tour de France”. Tom Gildred is not a MAN. He is a module, a, Platform. One known to Trademark Tom Gildred [joke] persistently years after USTD cautioned the mark is not tradable, please do not laugh as yet. Think of a mouse, that harness himself with a magnifying glass and one who wears an oversized facemask imprint with a tiger's face and runs around fooling/scaring everyone into believing that he's a Big Bad Tiger on the loose in San Diego.

He's the guy to sound off a tigrrsraw only upon the highest hills of Tijuana in hopes it will echo the valleys throughout Carmel that to make a sound of a real bad tiger. [Got himself all the ways in New York Supreme Court Gildred v Foster 153554-2017 made a fool of himself]. On the other hand as any good devoted trophy yes-wife would:- Carolina Hernandez Gildred: what's earnestly said to be a sure fact about this Latina. Quot., “I know of her...[For God's Sake she's a slow F**k. And if she likes it SHE WILL WORK HONESTLY HARD ENOUGH TO PAY FOR IT.” unquote. [They're peas in a pod]. Except Tom's wife being an avid NY Times reader of the Metro Columns she loves to have a good LAUGH. ...and by that she would LAUGH at anything especially another man's idiosyncrasies. [
But when the joke is up].
And when that joke [was] is up she falls on both-hind-legs an act rather bewildered, [as one's dog a hungered]. She'll argue that it's all for her children now past college ages Bryant and Diana Castillo both cared less. Quoting son Bryant: “My mother just want to dance” unquote. But for Carolina Hernandez, her mother, brother and hosts of Mexican Siblings it's a taste of both worlds [one of salted-sweet & peppery hot]. For her [Gildred] money answerers all issues regardless if the content involves someone who might not be willing to negotiate $$$. Like trump -YOU CANNOT SAY TO CERTAIN PEOPLE THEY ARE SICK”. ...and by this I hope this part of our conversation be redacted as that just seams to work for this couple as it appears to fuel their own enigma to propel themselves into a place [for now] only San Diego could offer. [But] ...even San Diego in this area will change in a probable near future from “Pay me enough & I will accept you whoever you are”. Tom & Carolina Gildred beware even a brother-in-law warns about accepting “the horrors that comes with the Gildred Evil money” They're the snapshot for Quick-A-Go. Tom: what's to know of him...”
A fundamental looser...

Carolina Hernandez [Garcia] Gildred: is one that proves herself as an articulate manipulator with immense experience and witness to the Humaneutics Mental Depredation science and astrology based. Using both combination she is cable of properly persuading anyone she has personal access to, to a purpose or cause. In my opinion, Carolina's Mental psychosis is yet to be determine by perhaps a group of psychiatrists. Carolina was once married to New York upper lifestyle living Scarsdale New York veteran Psychiatrist Dr. Emanuel Orlando Garcia now in his 80's was married to Carolina in the prime of her life..  of astrology and what is sure to know of her...[For God's Sake she's a slow F**k. And if she likes it SHE WILL WORK HONESTLY HARD ENOUGH TO PAY FOR IT. [They're peas in a pod]. ....and the echelons of San Diego's business align with certain political movers and shakers. They're going to take his lascivious legs out from under him. The Gildred's Gildred family of San Diego have taken the high road to destruction of a young man who's involvement with Tom Gildred's Wife Carolina Gildred threatens to ridicule The Gildred Family Name of San Diego. MARK THESE WORDS. ....and that's in a manner of speaking to his intellectual property which he has none. Simple put, it'll be giving back to those innocent young entrepreneurs he'd stolen it from. Standby! C/O: Mic Fos The Bravest

Tom Gildred Wife Defamation IIED Trial is Jan/13/20 Gildred v Foster (Seth A. Rafkin Attorney vs Prose)

FMT Consulting Executive's wife's on Defamation & IIED. Claims x-allege Lover (She) Did not Tango off the dance floor even after "A Romantic Picnic In The Park NYC, flying him several times to the couples Rancho Santa Fe's porch digs - multiple date-nights in Manhattan NYC,  Del Mar, Ocean Beach, Pacific Beach, Escondido, Vyvant Hotel Little Italy San Diego & Brunch at Rancho Valencia Luxurious Country Club where she and her husband are active founding members.

< >

San Diego, (  - The Gildreds (Tom Gildred) Gildred of North San Diego. Both Tom and Carolina are denying an affair ever happened even after Gildred's wife flew the x-allege-lover to their Del Mar Rancho Santa Fe's home over a series of visits under the guise of tango dance instruction in 2016.
The x-allege lover is counter suing the Gildreds for over 7.5 million dollars claiming IIED, Defamation and Breach of Contract. (Allegedly billed to Gildred and his companies for the promotional benefits derived from the promotional leads stemming from the Gildred's frivolous lawsuit - Tom Gildred have subsequently Trademarked his name Tom Gildreda derivative associated with the lawsuit). Michael Foster vs Tom Gildred San Diego Superio Court TODAY
The Gildred couple have been accused of having fostered a relentless out of court harassment campaign which at first accounted for as a slap on the wrists for an underestimated extramarital affair allegedly between Tom's Wife Carolina Gildred and Michael Foster. Court papers and witnesses known to have been friends to Carolina and Foster confirmed they'd known each other for roughly 15+ years. Though the Gildred's court papers affirms she first met him at dance competitions in 2015.
The Gildred's sophisticated campaign included an alleged cover-up by an in-court frivolous lawsuit campaign design to harass and push the x-allege lover into a state of mental insanity. (Lawyer SethHe'll either have to go completely crazy or come after you in which case he'll still be completely insane).
The couple is alleged according to court (REDACTED) documents filed by the x-Cooley Law Partner Attorneys Jennifer Bogue, Seth A. Rafkin Esq., The legal firm have Concocted a letter of Mental Diagnosis, "A Professional Opinion" from a Top Psychiatrist who (consequentially) happens to be the x-husband of Tom Gildred's wife Carolina (Then Carolina Garcia of Upscale living in Scarsdale New York). The letter states among other things that the x-allege lover is a case of Dangerous Erotomania. (A mental disease know to be consistent with women who have grown to lust at TV Celebrity status of mostly men in high social life). The Tango lover isn't known to have a history of mental illness and have not been seen by the psychiatrist Manuel Orlando (Dr. Redacted) named in the Gildred's court documents. There are other direct linking reports to the Gildred's blatant harassment campaign. As lately as In September 2019; of "2" consecutive police reports involving altercations between the Gildred's and their allege assailant where its allege the Gildreds and their Carlsbad Attorney Seth Alan Rafkin harass the Respondent. 
Rafkin defended the Gildred of San Diego who once was the CEO Tom Gildred San Diego's Largest health LiAngelica textiles vs Emerald Textiles Law Suit San Diego Defended by Cooley Law Alan Seth Rafkin nen company in "Emerald Textiles v Angelica Textiles", Tom Gildred of Gildredco and the Gildred Companies who's names are indigenous to that of ambassador (Argentine) Theodore Gildred, Sister Tory Gildred, and families Ted, Jen, Julie Gildred, Tory Gildred, Lynn & Phil Gildred.
Comments: The courts in New York her honorable Senior Administrative Judge Kaplan (Chan)

Full Story continues here:
Our Study on North San Diego Crime report

The story flamboyantly played up Tom Gildred and Wife as victims of an extortion attempt to extort Tom and his wife of 10k and the Foster Tango guy had become unhinged in the interview which lawyer Seth Rafkin - responded.
Was this a deterrent i.e. cover-up al be it "alibi? To a more sinister out of court criminal intent? Coincidence of intent? Michael Foster the Tango Instructor x-Allege lover to Tom Gildred's Wife Carolina Gildred
In the meanwhile the Tango allege love faced a litany of circumstantial circumstances from death threats, landlord suddenly cancelling his apartment lease, to questionable loss of clients. The tango instructor's life as an NYC Dance instructor for 20+ years was over and he had no one to blame for each defaming public action against his character. The Tango instructor was refused entry at public social events he'd attending for years without issues
|There were New York Police Reports included a 911 call a few months after the commencement of the Gildred's lawsuit. The x-allege Tango Lover of Tom Gildred's wife was reported to have suffered a near miss-hit on his life, which could have landed him in a comma, if not death or paralysis.  Tom Gildred cautioned by partner Jaye Park Emerald Textiles Not enough perhaps?
The allegations is allege to have stemmed from an outrage Tom Gildred who was willing to do anything so that Carolina his wife will not leave him for the Tango Lover.
Transcripts have revealed the wealthy Gildred Family have reverted to cautioning but could not dissuade the younger of the Gildreds of San Diego to let it go. Thompson's parents Lynn & Phil Gildred once owned the Fox Theater of San Diego and are vested owners of multi-unit residential properties in Maui Hawaii. The Gildred Companies are know to be owners of multi-million dollar properties commercial and residential through San Diego. 
The Gildred claimed according to New York Supreme Court Documents files by Seth their attorney the allege lover sort to extort $10,000.00. The Gildred's seeks $250,000.00 according to court documents. 
In the abstract Tom Gildred and wife Carolina (Mother of two allege DaCa Kids. Daughter Diana and Son Bryant Castillo, both kids having disgruntled remakes concerning their isolated Mexican Father who have been ridden thereof. Years ago. Carolina have been allege to have illegally crossed the boarder from Mexico and have had at lease one run in with the Law in Los Angeles for transportation of methamphetamine sources revealed while with her two young kids Bryant 3, and Diana 5. The father have since been restrained from having any part to do with their lives, but thanks to Mr. Gildred especially after the x-lover affair altercations most of Carolina's siblings have been reunited with her from Mexico). As for Tom Gildred, in reverberation to the lawsuit and the many out of court harassment tactics he earned himself an unexpected defense from his wife's x-allege lover and Tango Partner in the forms of a number of scalding YouTube messages sounding off the allege details of a lovers gross distress and a few websites in the names: Tom Gildred why The lawsuit, why not ignor the lover say so if it is not so leave it so and (the Later) according to (Tom Gildred's) lawyer Seth Rafkin of Carlsbad North San Diego.
These and other innocuous criminal acts are not being investigated because they are barb-wired with so much wealthy connections that before a local police detective were to begin an investigation, far less taking police reports (i.e.: wife Carolina Gildred in 2016 attempted to create a report of Husband Tom Gildred of 'an allege gurgle pilling after-midnight attempt" which left her ankles and above her knee cap with black and blue spots). On the record even after the wife admitted that Quote EmeraldSD, San Diego Reader, Emerald Textiles, FMT Consultants, Gildred Companies, Carolina Gildred with Tom Gildred ! Quote " Tom awoke me in the middle of the Night and said HEAR TAKE THAT - and muttered - you're gurgling" unquote! She then assuage dozing off.
Seth Alan Rafkin Esq., "Alan is known to have saved Tom Gildred's Emerald Textiles commercial Linen Company in an intellectual Property Theft Angelica Textiles vs Emerald Textiles of which he earned 1.5 million in legal expenses after the long court battle in San Diego..
The very said attorney is under review by the legal board of ethics for swiping out an iPhone camera and began illegally video taping the aggravated harassment scenes in NYC just in September allege to have been preempted by him and his clients in hopes to provoke a physical confrontation from the wife's x-allege love. Both incidents were instantly reported to the NYPD - one incident earned a 911 call when Tom physically confronted Michael Foster immediately steps from the x-allege tango lovers office building the following Friday afternoon in Chelsea NYC. Apparently at this time the Gildred duo wish to impute an attack on themselves in New York in order to draw consequential alignment to their attorney's frivolous lawsuit.
The merits of the lawsuit stands affirmative that what is left only to litigate Respondent's counter claims seeing that Seth already confirm a settlement which Prose Litigant denied and the judge...



Inadvertently! Conspicuously!
The police harassment Report (of "2" consecutive incidents miles apart over 2 days, of a confrontation to harass and incriminate involving Mr.. Thompson Philip Gildred against ProSe Respondent Michael Foster at 66 center street and 17th street 9th Avenue outside ProSe's office building.) Report#:4555/ 09/18/19 and 09/20/19. full story here:

Attorney Seth Alan Gildred of San Diego who once defended CEO Tom Gildred emerald Textiles v Angelica Textiles, Tom Gildred of Gildredco and the gildred Companies who's names are indigenous to theordore gildred, tory gildred, ted and Julie gildred. The courts in New York the honorable Senior Administrative Judge Kaplan (Chan)
Rancho Santa fe
California, Rancho San Diego
6197865011 Philanthropy, business man, Tom, Lynn, Phil, Phillip, Lyn, Julie, Tory, Gildred, Rancho Santa Fe, Santa Yenez California, Del Ma, Las Ventanas Circle, La Jolla, Carolina Gildred, Michael Foster, Tom Gildred, Gildred Philanthropy, business man, Tom, Lynn, Phil, Phillip, Lyn, Julie, Tory, Gildred, Rancho Santa Fe, Santa Yenez California, Del Ma, Las Ventanas Circle, La Jolla, Carolina Gildred, Michael Foster, Tom Gildred, Gildred Properties, Gildredco, Gildred Companies, Gildred Development, FMT Board, CEO, Director, Marriage, Lover, Tango, New York, Pay-per, Writer, Publisher, San Diego Reader, Union Tribune, North San Diego, Big Donors, Lobbyist, Entrepreneur, Philanthropist, Art Collector, Artist, Boar Member, San Diego Museum of Arts, San Diego Zoo, SDMA, Red Cross of San Diego, Scripts Health, Emerald textiles SD, Emerald Textiles, Gregg Haggart, CEO Tom Gildred, Carolina Hernandez, Dr. Manuel Orlando Garcia, Psychiatrist, Mental Illness, Lies, Deceit, Corrupt politician of San Diego,

Donate A Matrimonial Infidelity Catch & Kill Story in CEO FMT Consultants Tom Gildred of San Diego by Seth Alan Rafkin & Jennifer McGuire Bogue